Let’s say that a compliance platform is $12,000 per annum. Are you paying too much?
It’s dependent on the part you are replacing.
Automating the collection of evidence in a complicated technology system eliminates hundreds of hours of tedious work then $12,000 is a wise investment. If a small business of seven people could gather the same data by hand in just a few hours every month, the total is quite different.
That’s a useful way to approach the search for a Vanta alternative. Start with asking which platform has the most features. Think about what features allow your company to save time and energy.
Automated Manufacturing has an End-of-Even
It’s not necessarily either good or bad. The value of compliance automation changes as the company grows. Imagine an expanding technology company that has multiple cloud environments and many applications. Manually collecting evidence could be a major operational burden. Integrations that monitor systems automatically and collect evidence easily justify their cost.
Imagine a small-scale business of 10 people who are preparing to go through the initial SOC 2. audit. Think about a startup that has 10 employees who are preparing for their first SOC 2.
Vanta pricing is based on this variation. Although an advanced platform might provide a variety of capabilities, they are only valuable when the organization is in need of them.
Compare Architecture not just Brands
Vanta Vs Drata is a discussion that could easily be a feature-by-feature test. Both platforms are built on automation and integration and therefore, companies seeking this method can benefit from having a look at the frameworks available along with their integrations and services as well as individual quotations and contracts.
But there’s still another decision you’ll need to make. Are you interested in an integration-driven platform for compliance? Certain companies want automated evidence collection, as well as constant monitoring. Some companies prefer to collect evidence by themselves.
Vanta Competitors Don’t Always Follow the same model
A number of well-known Vanta competitors compete in a market that has a similar focus on automation. There are also lighter platforms that concentrate on organization over large system connectivity.
CertAssist belongs to the latter category. Created by compliance consultants and internal auditors, CertAssist organizes framework controls in a central work area, allows for the editing of policies as well as evidence-based guidance. It also allows auditors to review evidence submitted with the use of read-only access.
It doesn’t intend to connect to operating systems or create infrastructure agents. Customers choose and upload the evidence they want to provide.
System Access is a consideration in the Making
Removing integrations has an obvious disadvantage: somebody must gather evidence manually.
This removes the requirement for integration and the application of compliance is not dependent on an integration with the operational environment.
Neither architecture is universally superior. The important question is which tradeoff makes sense to your business.
CertAssist targets teams that have between five and 200 participants. Its pricing is publicized rather than requiring a sales call to get the first figure. The price for its launch is $225 per month which is compared to a standard price of $375 monthly.
Let Complexity Find Its Proper Place
What a start-up with 10 employees needs today may not be the same when you have 100 or even 500 employees.
While compliance is simple an easy platform can be a good idea. The cost of automation could increase as systems, employees and frameworks expand. Allow complexity to take the lead when buying compliance technologies.
Do not pay for fifty different integrations simply because they look impressive on the comparison chart. You should purchase them only if they are necessary and the cost for doing the work manually is more expensive.